LM-VS™ Designed Scaffold Technology

LM-VS™ Designed Scaffold Technology

Translates
Molecular Dynamics
Into
Logical Hit Discovery

Translates
Molecular Dynamics
Into
Logical Hit Discovery

LM-VS™ understands molecular dynamics
discovering hits that stay stable, not just fit the pocket.

LM-VS™ understands molecular dynamics
discovering hits that stay stable, not just fit the pocket.

3 Target Verification

3 Target Verification

3 Target Verification

Challenges of Hit Discovery,
The Solutions Proposed by LM-VS™

Challenges of Hit Discovery,
The Solutions Proposed by LM-VS™

LM-VS™ has demonstrated stable and consistent binding with three challenging targets:
EGFR, MDM2, and CDK6.

LM-VS™ has demonstrated stable and consistent binding with three challenging targets: EGFR, MDM2, and CDK6.

Structural Variability of Membrane Proteins

EGFR (Transmembrane Receptor)

High structural variability during activation and mutation frequently reshapes the binding pocket.
 Under such dynamic conditions, small molecules struggle to maintain stable interactions.

Structural Variability of Membrane Proteins

EGFR (Transmembrane Receptor)

High structural variability during activation and mutation frequently reshapes the binding pocket.
 Under such dynamic conditions, small molecules struggle to maintain stable interactions.

Structural Variability of Membrane Proteins

EGFR (Transmembrane Receptor)

High structural variability during activation and mutation frequently reshapes the binding pocket.
 Under such dynamic conditions, small molecules struggle to maintain stable interactions.

Structural Variability of Membrane Proteins

EGFR (Transmembrane Receptor)

High structural variability during activation and mutation frequently reshapes the binding pocket.
 Under such dynamic conditions, small molecules struggle to maintain stable interactions.

Flat and Shallow Interaction Interfaces

MDM2 (Protein–Protein Interaction)

MDM2, which interacts with p53 on a broad and flat surface, offers little pocket depth for stable binding. Such a limited interface makes it difficult for typical small molecules to achieve sufficient affinity.

Flat and Shallow Interaction Interfaces

MDM2 (Protein–Protein Interaction)

MDM2, which interacts with p53 on a broad and flat surface, offers little pocket depth for stable binding. Such a limited interface makes it difficult for typical small molecules to achieve sufficient affinity.

Flat and Shallow Interaction Interfaces

MDM2 (Protein–Protein Interaction)

MDM2, which interacts with p53 on a broad and flat surface, offers little pocket depth for stable binding. Such a limited interface makes it difficult for typical small molecules to achieve sufficient affinity.

Flat and Shallow Interaction Interfaces

MDM2 (Protein–Protein Interaction)

MDM2, which interacts with p53 on a broad and flat surface, offers little pocket depth for stable binding. Such a limited interface makes it difficult for typical small molecules to achieve sufficient affinity.

Precision Control of Dual Binding Geometry

CDK6 (TPD Warhead Anchoring)

In TPD, the warhead must anchor precisely to control orientation and distance for forming ternary complexes with E3 ligases. But CDK6's deep, narrow pocket makes stable alignment nearly impossible.

Precision Control of Dual Binding Geometry

CDK6 (TPD Warhead Anchoring)

In TPD, the warhead must anchor precisely to control orientation and distance for forming ternary complexes with E3 ligases. But CDK6's deep, narrow pocket makes stable alignment nearly impossible.

Precision Control of Dual Binding Geometry

CDK6 (TPD Warhead Anchoring)

In TPD, the warhead must anchor precisely to control orientation and distance for forming ternary complexes with E3 ligases. But CDK6's deep, narrow pocket makes stable alignment nearly impossible.

Precision Control of Dual Binding Geometry

CDK6 (TPD Warhead Anchoring)

In TPD, the warhead must anchor precisely to control orientation and distance for forming ternary complexes with E3 ligases. But CDK6's deep, narrow pocket makes stable alignment nearly impossible.

Working on a challenging target?

LM-VS™ finds the logic behind binding — and helps you apply it to your own target.

LM-VS™ finds the logic behind binding —
and helps you apply it to your own target.

Transmembrane Receptor

Transmembrane Receptor

Case 1. EGFR —
Stable Binding in Dynamic Structures

Case 1. EGFR —
Stable Binding in Dynamic Structures

Problem

Why is it challenging?

EGFR undergoes significant conformational changes during activation and mutation, causing frequent reshaping of its binding pocket and charge distribution.

Conventional docking methods treat proteins as static structures, often failing to predict reliable binding modes.

IV (Input View)

How did LM-VS™ approach it?

By analyzing thousands of conformational frames, LM-VS™ identified anchor residues that remain stable across transitions and used them as the foundation for scaffold design.

Problem

Why is it challenging?

EGFR undergoes significant conformational changes during activation and mutation, causing frequent reshaping of its binding pocket and charge distribution.

Conventional docking methods treat proteins as static structures, often failing to predict reliable binding modes.

IV (Input View)

How did LM-VS™ approach it?

By analyzing thousands of conformational frames, LM-VS™ identified anchor residues that remain stable across transitions and used them as the foundation for scaffold design.

Problem

Why is it challenging?

EGFR undergoes significant conformational changes during activation and mutation, causing frequent reshaping of its binding pocket and charge distribution.

Conventional docking methods treat proteins as static structures, often failing to predict reliable binding modes.

IV (Input View)

How did LM-VS™ approach it?

By analyzing thousands of conformational frames, LM-VS™ identified anchor residues that remain stable across transitions and used them as the foundation for scaffold design.

Problem

Why is it challenging?

EGFR undergoes significant conformational changes during activation and mutation, causing frequent reshaping of its binding pocket and charge distribution.

Conventional docking methods treat proteins as static structures, often failing to predict reliable binding modes.

IV (Input View)

How did LM-VS™ approach it?

By analyzing thousands of conformational frames, LM-VS™ identified anchor residues that remain stable across transitions and used them as the foundation for scaffold design.

PAV (Post Analysis View)

Does it really work?

Incorporating full dynamic motion into the design preserved stable interactions throughout conformational shifts. Anchored scaffolds maintained contact even in regions where binding was expected to break.

Significance

A Shift in Design Philosophy

Instead of avoiding Molecular Dynamics, LM-VS™ integrates structural flexibility as a design variable — proving that motion-aware scaffolds can achieve stable binding on dynamic targets.

PAV (Post Analysis View)

Does it really work?

Incorporating full dynamic motion into the design preserved stable interactions throughout conformational shifts. Anchored scaffolds maintained contact even in regions where binding was expected to break.

Significance

A Shift in Design Philosophy

Instead of avoiding Molecular Dynamics, LM-VS™ integrates structural flexibility as a design variable — proving that motion-aware scaffolds can achieve stable binding on dynamic targets.

PAV (Post Analysis View)

Does it really work?

Incorporating full dynamic motion into the design preserved stable interactions throughout conformational shifts. Anchored scaffolds maintained contact even in regions where binding was expected to break.

Significance

A Shift in Design Philosophy

Instead of avoiding Molecular Dynamics, LM-VS™ integrates structural flexibility as a design variable — proving that motion-aware scaffolds can achieve stable binding on dynamic targets.

PAV (Post Analysis View)

Does it really work?

Incorporating full dynamic motion into the design preserved stable interactions throughout conformational shifts. Anchored scaffolds maintained contact even in regions where binding was expected to break.

Significance

A Shift in Design Philosophy

Instead of avoiding Molecular Dynamics, LM-VS™ integrates structural flexibility as a design variable — proving that motion-aware scaffolds can achieve stable binding on dynamic targets.

PPI Surface

PPI Surface

Case 2. MDM2 —
Shape Complementarity on Flat Surfaces

Case 2. MDM2 —
Shape Complementarity on Flat Surfaces

Problem

Why is it challenging?

MDM2 interacts with the tumor-suppressor protein p53 on a shallow and flat groove with little depth. Conventional inhibitors mimic the binding mode of p53, but lack sufficient surface complementarity to maintain stable adhesion — resulting in weak and transient binding on the flat interface.

IV (Input View)

How did LM-VS™ approach it?

Analyzed surface curvature to locate hydrophobic anchors and designed scaffolds that adhere to the contour rather than penetrating the plane.

Problem

Why is it challenging?

MDM2 interacts with the tumor-suppressor protein p53 on a shallow and flat groove with little depth. Conventional inhibitors mimic the binding mode of p53, but lack sufficient surface complementarity to maintain stable adhesion — resulting in weak and transient binding on the flat interface.

IV (Input View)

How did LM-VS™ approach it?

Analyzed surface curvature to locate hydrophobic anchors and designed scaffolds that adhere to the contour rather than penetrating the plane.

Problem

Why is it challenging?

MDM2 interacts with the tumor-suppressor protein p53 on a shallow and flat groove with little depth. Conventional inhibitors mimic the binding mode of p53, but lack sufficient surface complementarity to maintain stable adhesion — resulting in weak and transient binding on the flat interface.

IV (Input View)

How did LM-VS™ approach it?

Analyzed surface curvature to locate hydrophobic anchors and designed scaffolds that adhere to the contour rather than penetrating the plane.

Problem

Why is it challenging?

MDM2 interacts with the tumor-suppressor protein p53 on a shallow and flat groove with little depth. Conventional inhibitors mimic the binding mode of p53, but lack sufficient surface complementarity to maintain stable adhesion — resulting in weak and transient binding on the flat interface.

IV (Input View)

How did LM-VS™ approach it?

Analyzed surface curvature to locate hydrophobic anchors and designed scaffolds that adhere to the contour rather than penetrating the plane.

PAV (Post Analysis View)

Does it really work?

The LM-VS™ designed scaffold covered the interface snugly, showing improved persistence and complementarity compared to traditional inhibitors.

Significance

A Shift in Design Philosophy

A protein surface is not a limitation — it is a landscape to be engineered. By aligning electronic density instead of pursuing depth, LM-VS™ achieved structural persistence even on flat interfaces.

PAV (Post Analysis View)

Does it really work?

The LM-VS™ designed scaffold covered the interface snugly, showing improved persistence and complementarity compared to traditional inhibitors.

Significance

A Shift in Design Philosophy

A protein surface is not a limitation — it is a landscape to be engineered. By aligning electronic density instead of pursuing depth, LM-VS™ achieved structural persistence even on flat interfaces.

PAV (Post Analysis View)

Does it really work?

The LM-VS™ designed scaffold covered the interface snugly, showing improved persistence and complementarity compared to traditional inhibitors.

Significance

A Shift in Design Philosophy

A protein surface is not a limitation — it is a landscape to be engineered. By aligning electronic density instead of pursuing depth, LM-VS™ achieved structural persistence even on flat interfaces.

PAV (Post Analysis View)

Does it really work?

The LM-VS™ designed scaffold covered the interface snugly, showing improved persistence and complementarity compared to traditional inhibitors.

Significance

A Shift in Design Philosophy

A protein surface is not a limitation — it is a landscape to be engineered. By aligning electronic density instead of pursuing depth, LM-VS™ achieved structural persistence even on flat interfaces.

TPD Warhead Design

TPD Warhead Design

Case 3. CDK6 —
Precision Control in Dual Binding Geometry

Case 3. CDK6 —
Precision Control in Dual Binding Geometry

Problem

Why is it challenging?

CDK6, a cell-cycle regulatory kinase, features a deep, narrow ATP pocket.

Conventional inhibitors strengthen hinge binding but lose geometric balance when forming ternary complexes with E3 ligases.

IV (Input View)

How did LM-VS™ approach it?

Maintained the hinge axis while re-aligning local hydrophobic networks to fix the binding direction and spatial orientation.

Problem

Why is it challenging?

CDK6, a cell-cycle regulatory kinase, features a deep, narrow ATP pocket.

Conventional inhibitors strengthen hinge binding but lose geometric balance when forming ternary complexes with E3 ligases.

IV (Input View)

How did LM-VS™ approach it?

Maintained the hinge axis while re-aligning local hydrophobic networks to fix the binding direction and spatial orientation.

Problem

Why is it challenging?

CDK6, a cell-cycle regulatory kinase, features a deep, narrow ATP pocket.

Conventional inhibitors strengthen hinge binding but lose geometric balance when forming ternary complexes with E3 ligases.

IV (Input View)

How did LM-VS™ approach it?

Maintained the hinge axis while re-aligning local hydrophobic networks to fix the binding direction and spatial orientation.

Problem

Why is it challenging?

CDK6, a cell-cycle regulatory kinase, features a deep, narrow ATP pocket.

Conventional inhibitors strengthen hinge binding but lose geometric balance when forming ternary complexes with E3 ligases.

IV (Input View)

How did LM-VS™ approach it?

Maintained the hinge axis while re-aligning local hydrophobic networks to fix the binding direction and spatial orientation.

PAV (Post Analysis View)

Does it really work?

The designed warhead retained its orientation and balance, ensuring stable complex formation during E3 binding.

Significance

A Shift in Design Philosophy

Beyond simply improving potency, LM-VS™ proposes a structural buffering strategy — minimizing conformational distortion during degradation complex formation.

PAV (Post Analysis View)

Does it really work?

The designed warhead retained its orientation and balance, ensuring stable complex formation during E3 binding.

Significance

A Shift in Design Philosophy

Beyond simply improving potency, LM-VS™ proposes a structural buffering strategy — minimizing conformational distortion during degradation complex formation.

PAV (Post Analysis View)

Does it really work?

The designed warhead retained its orientation and balance, ensuring stable complex formation during E3 binding.

Significance

A Shift in Design Philosophy

Beyond simply improving potency, LM-VS™ proposes a structural buffering strategy — minimizing conformational distortion during degradation complex formation.

PAV (Post Analysis View)

Does it really work?

The designed warhead retained its orientation and balance, ensuring stable complex formation during E3 binding.

Significance

A Shift in Design Philosophy

Beyond simply improving potency, LM-VS™ proposes a structural buffering strategy — minimizing conformational distortion during degradation complex formation.

One Principle, Across All Targets

One Principle, Across All Targets

One Principle, Across All Targets

One Principle, Across All Targets

From Observation to Validation —
A Unified Logic for Molecular Design

From Observation to Validation — A Unified Logic
for Molecular Design

Designed Scaffold LM-VS™ observes protein dynamics, learns persistent binding patterns,
designs scaffolds based on these pattern, and validates their stability through AI-based simulation. 

Designed Scaffold LM-VS™ observes protein dynamics, learns persistent binding patterns,
designs scaffolds based on these pattern, and validates their stability through AI-based simulation. 

Observe

Tracking protein motion over time

Observe

Tracking protein motion over time

Observe

Tracking protein motion over time

Observe

Tracking protein motion over time

Learn

Learn persistent binding patterns

Learn

Learn persistent binding patterns

Learn

Learn persistent binding patterns

Learn

Learn persistent binding patterns

Design

Creating structures that fit the pattern

Design

Creating structures that fit the pattern

Design

Creating structures that fit the pattern

Design

Creating structures that fit the pattern

Validate

Testing stablity and performance

Validate

Testing stablity and performance

Validate

Testing stablity and performance

Validate

Testing stablity and performance

EGFR

MDM2

CDK6

Strategy

Controlling structural flexibility

Compensate for flat surface

Balance dual-site geometry

Issues

Active–inactive transition

Flat-surface instability

Narrow pocket restriction

Observation

Track motion dynamics

Map surface electrons

Map dual-site vectors

Learning

Find stable pivots

Identify planar anchors

Learn spatial correlation

Design (IV)

Hinge-pivot control

π–π / CH–π network

Fix warhead direction

Validation (PAV)

Maintain binding stability

Enhance surface adhesion

Verify alignment & balance

EGFR

MDM2

CDK6

Strategy

Controlling structural flexibility

Compensate for flat surface

Balance dual-site geometry

Issues

Active–inactive transition

Flat-surface instability

Narrow pocket restriction

Observation

Track motion dynamics

Map surface electrons

Map dual-site vectors

Learning

Find stable pivots

Identify planar anchors

Learn spatial correlation

Design (IV)

Hinge-pivot control

π–π / CH–π network

Fix warhead direction

Validation (PAV)

Maintain binding stability

Enhance surface adhesion

Verify alignment & balance

EGFR

MDM2

CDK6

Strategy

Controlling structural flexibility

Compensate for flat surface

Balance dual-site geometry

Issues

Active–inactive transition

Flat-surface instability

Narrow pocket restriction

Observation

Track motion dynamics

Map surface electrons

Map dual-site vectors

Learning

Find stable pivots

Identify planar anchors

Learn spatial correlation

Design (IV)

Hinge-pivot control

π–π / CH–π network

Fix warhead direction

Validation (PAV)

Maintain binding stability

Enhance surface adhesion

Verify alignment & balance

EGFR

MDM2

CDK6

Strategy

Controlling structural flexibility

Compensate for flat surface

Balance dual-site geometry

Issues

Active–inactive transition

Flat-surface instability

Narrow pocket restriction

Observation

Track motion dynamics

Map surface electrons

Map dual-site vectors

Learning

Find stable pivots

Identify planar anchors

Learn spatial correlation

Design (IV)

Hinge-pivot control

π–π / CH–π network

Fix warhead direction

Validation (PAV)

Maintain binding stability

Enhance surface adhesion

Verify alignment & balance

Features

Features

Features

Features

Efficiency Maximized
by the Precision of Technology

Efficiency Maximized
by the Precision of Technology

LM-VS™ redefines Hit Discovery — delivering faster results, fewer failures, and lower costs.

LM-VS™ sets a new standard for Hit Discovery, not just in speed, but in accuracy
and validated data.

Accelerated Hit Discovery

Identify purchasable and synthesizable hit candidates within 2 weeks from a 10 billion-compound library.

Accelerated Hit Discovery

Identify purchasable and synthesizable hit candidates within 2 weeks from a 10 billion-compound library.

Accelerated Hit Discovery

Identify purchasable and synthesizable hit candidates within 2 weeks from a 10 billion-compound library.

Accelerated Hit Discovery

Identify purchasable and synthesizable hit candidates within 2 weeks from a 10 billion-compound library.

Reduced Trial & Error

Multiple rounds of AI learning refine prediction accuracy and increase confidence in hit validation.

Reduced Trial & Error

Multiple rounds of AI learning refine prediction accuracy and increase confidence in hit validation.

Reduced Trial & Error

Multiple rounds of AI learning refine prediction accuracy and increase confidence in hit validation.

Reduced Trial & Error

Multiple rounds of AI learning refine prediction accuracy and increase confidence in hit validation.

Cost-Efficient Research

AI-validated data and SAR-based insights streamline optimization and maximize research ROI.

Cost-Efficient Research

AI-validated data and SAR-based insights streamline optimization and maximize research ROI.

Cost-Efficient Research

AI-validated data and SAR-based insights streamline optimization and maximize research ROI.

Cost-Efficient Research

AI-validated data and SAR-based insights streamline optimization and maximize research ROI.

Process

Process

Process

Process

2-Week Completion Process

2-Week Completion Process

We share progress throughout the process and apply your feedback to accelerate successful Hit discovery.

We transparently share all stages from design to analysis and reporting based on target protein information, completing it together.

Deliverables

Deliverables

Deliverables

Deliverables

Comprehensive Hit Discovery Results Package

Comprehensive Hit Discovery Results Package

LM-VS™ delivers purchasable or synthesis-ready small-molecule candidates optimized for stable binding through AI, 
reducing the time from Hit Discovery to lab validation.

LM-VS™ delivers purchasable or synthesis-ready small-molecule candidates optimized for stable binding through AI, 
reducing the time from Hit Discovery to lab validation.

LM-VS™ delivers purchasable or synthesis-ready
small-molecule candidates optimized for stable binding through AI, 
reducing the time from Hit Discovery to lab validation.

IV (Input View) Report

Visualization of scaffold design basis and structure

Protein–ligand interaction mapping

Key binding site analysis

PAV (Post Analysis View) Report

Visualization of Hit structures and interaction patterns

Protein–ligand binding mode interpretation

Hit summary and structural comparison

Final Report

Summary of key Hit candidates

Final Hit list with key metrics

3D Structures

Designed scaffold structures

Protein–ligand complex structures

Pricing

Pricing

Pricing

Pricing

Collaboration Models Tailored to
Research Stages and Goals

Collaboration Models Tailored to
Research Stages and Goals

Accelerate discovery, refine leads, and build lasting collaborations —
select the model that fits your research stage.

From early stages requiring rapid validation to strategic co-development, you can choose the most efficient collaboration method based on the speed and goals of your research.
Check out the optimal program for your research stage.

Standard

Popular

$20,000

/ Target Protein

Ideal for rapid Hit discovery and new target validation

AI-driven Hit design & screening

3rd-party app integrations

3rd-party app integrations

AI-driven Hit design & screening

Complete analysis package (IV+PAV+Reports)

Advanced analytics

Advanced analytics

Complete analysis package (IV+PAV+Reports)

Advanced

Guidance After Consultation

Ideal for expanding from Hit discovery to lead optimization

Follow-up lead design and optimization

Follow-up lead design and optimization

Follow-up lead design and optimization

Follow-up lead design and optimization

Customized analysis based on research goals

Customized analysis based on research goals

Customized analysis based on research goals

Customized analysis based on research goals

Partnership

Decision After Consultation

Design for strategic co-development and data collaboration

Joint research on custom AI algorithms and pipelines

Dedicated account & success manager

Dedicated account & success manager

Joint research on custom AI algorithms and pipelines

Long-term partnership with shared research goals

Custom dashboards & reports

Custom dashboards & reports

Long-term partnership with shared research goals

Support Center

Support Center

Support Center

Support Center

FAQ

FAQ

Is there any information or materials that the client needs to prepare for the consultation?

Are there minimum project size or conditions?

Is it possible to request intermediate reviews or modifications?

How are costs calculated?

Is it possible to issue proof documents such as invoices upon payment?

Is it possible to get a refund or cancellation?

Can the results be used for IP registration or patent strategies?

Can it be expanded into follow-up research or joint development?

How is data security and confidentiality ensured?

Is there any information or materials that the client needs to prepare for the consultation?

Are there minimum project size or conditions?

Is it possible to request intermediate reviews or modifications?

How are costs calculated?

Is it possible to issue proof documents such as invoices upon payment?

Is it possible to get a refund or cancellation?

Can the results be used for IP registration or patent strategies?

Can it be expanded into follow-up research or joint development?

How is data security and confidentiality ensured?

Is there any information or materials that the client needs to prepare for the consultation?

Are there minimum project size or conditions?

Is it possible to request intermediate reviews or modifications?

How are costs calculated?

Is it possible to issue proof documents such as invoices upon payment?

Is it possible to get a refund or cancellation?

Can the results be used for IP registration or patent strategies?

Can it be expanded into follow-up research or joint development?

How is data security and confidentiality ensured?

Is there any information or materials that the client needs to prepare for the consultation?

Are there minimum project size or conditions?

Is it possible to request intermediate reviews or modifications?

How are costs calculated?

Is it possible to issue proof documents such as invoices upon payment?

Is it possible to get a refund or cancellation?

Can the results be used for IP registration or patent strategies?

Can it be expanded into follow-up research or joint development?

How is data security and confidentiality ensured?

Let’s Connect

Let’s Connect

Let’s Connect

Let’s Connect

Ready to experience LM-VS™ —
start your hit discovery now

LM-VS™ simulates molecular dynamics to predict drug–target binding patterns and delivers hit candidates in just two weeks.

LM-VS™ simulates
molecular dynamics to predict drug-target
binding patterns and delivers
hit candidates in just two weeks.

From Data to Discovery.

Designed with Logic, Driven by Purpose.

Contact Us

Contact Us

© Syntekabio Co., Ltd. All rights reserved.

Sales/Partnerships

bd@syntekabio.com

Family Sites

Family Sites

Sales/Partnerships

bd@syntekabio.com

© Syntekabio Co., Ltd. All rights reserved.

Family Sites

Sales/Partnerships

bd@syntekabio.com

© Syntekabio Co., Ltd. All rights reserved.

From Data to Discovery.

Designed with Logic, Driven by Purpose.

Contact Us

Contact Us

© Syntekabio Co., Ltd. All rights reserved.

Sales/Partnerships

bd@syntekabio.com

Family Sites